Friday, August 29, 2014

MS Society Interviews Dr. Burt

The following MS Society Q&A with Dr. Burt is making the rounds on MS chat groups and social media. In addition to being a good view of the benefits and risks of HSCT, it's some much-deservered recognition for a great man and a procedure that offers real help, not just hope, for those MS patients who aren't helped by drugs.
-----------------------------------------

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Interview with Dr. Richard Burt

Could you please explain the stem-cell procedure that you’re testing?   
We are testing a procedure called hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), but there are a lot of misnomers that can cause confusion for people who are not familiar with HSCT. First, hematopoietic stem cells are immune stem cells. So, perhaps a better term would be immune stem cell transplantation. Second, the word “transplant” can cause confusion. When people hear it they often think of a transplant for cancer and we do not use these cancer drugs; we don’t use radiation or any cancer treatments. Nor does HSCT include transplantation of someone else’s stem cells – we give the patient their own stem cells during the procedure.
We use standard immune suppressant drugs, commonly used to treat immune or autoimmune diseases, in a very short exposure and high dose to knock down the immune system, and then we give you back your own immune stem cells that we have collected before the procedure. Giving back your immune stem cells as a supportive blood product hastens recovery, but they’re not necessary – you’d recover fine without them.
In MS, the immune inflammation that destroys myelin requires two signals to get started, one is exposure to myelin or something that looks like myelin and the second is a danger signal-something that tells the body there is a need for an immune attack. If either of these two signals are missing, you will not get the inflammation that causes MS. In HSCT, we are starting over-resetting the immune system. Think of it like a re-boot of your computer, we are wiping the hard drive clean and starting over. The immune system has to learn all over again which things to fight (pathogens like bacteria and viruses) and which things to leave alone (myelin). We think what happens in HSCT is that the immune response is exposed to myelin in the absence of the danger signal and as a consequence is rendered harmless (tolerant), unable to do any more damage.
Is there a type of MS that is most likely to benefit from HSCT?
Yes, because what we’re doing is stopping inflammation you need to treat when the disease in its inflammatory stage, which occurs in relapsing remitting MS. We don’t think this treatment will be very helpful for people with progressive forms (primary or secondary) of MS. However, there are other forms of stem cell therapy, therapies designed to promote nervous system repair that hold great promise for treatment of all forms of disease, including progressive MS.
Are you still recruiting people for your trial?
Yes we are. The trial is still open and ongoing. You can learn more here.
You mentioned you won’t treat people who are in late secondary-progressive, are there certain types of people that are particularly appropriate or should consider the trial?
The best way to answer that question is where does this approach lie in the treatment of MS? There are first-line therapies such as Avonex and Copaxone. If someone’s MS is controlled well with first-line therapy, they should stick with their current therapy. But if they’re not, and they’re having frequent relapses, they’ll go to second line therapy.
Our randomized trial is looking at people who have failed a first-line therapy and have opted for stem cell transplantation over a second-line treatment. Our goal of the trial is to establish in a randomized trial that this is the proper role for HSCT. Our early data suggests that HSCT does something that second-line therapy has never done: it reverses disability and significantly improves quality of life.
Can you explain the terms myeloabalative and non-myeloablative?
Our procedure is non-myeloablative. Non-myeloablative means that while we are removing much of the immune system with our drug regime, if we did not replace these cells with stem cells, the patient would be able to recover. Myeloablative is a procedure usually reserved for cancer therapy that completely eliminates the stem cell compartment. In this case, the patient would not be able to survive without a stem cell transplant. We feel that the myeloablative approach is too toxic for patients with MS and shouldn’t be used in people with MS.
There are different centers performing HSCT around the world, is the treatment standardized in any way?
I hope that our trial will help standardize this approach when our clinical trial data is published,. We coordinate our trial at a few other centers around the world. The trial is also being run in University of Sao Paulo, Brazil the University of Uppsala in Stockholm, Sweden. It’s just been approved at the University of Sheffield in the UK, and I’m speaking in Sydney, Australia this month, because they want to open a center there as well. It is the same trial run in all locations.
There are people who may not qualify for your trial or who are looking for other options. Is there any advice or caution you’d offer to people as they explore other options?
We have developed certain criteria for accepting patients in our trial based on our experience and understanding how this therapy works. People do sometimes get upset when they don’t qualify and sometimes they seek out other treatment centers.
Of course you can always find someone who doesn’t have our level of experience understanding the limitations of the treatment and who may treat them, and of course that is your right to make your own treatment decisions, but you have to be cautious if somebody doesn’t have limits or say ‘this approach can’t help this subset.’ This is a very powerful technique and just like anything powerful it can be abused. If used the wrong way it can have adverse effects.
In the early development of something like this, experience of the care team is very important. You want to be sure to work with an experienced center that is dedicated to this form of transplantation. This is so promising and so exciting, but it is not without risks.
Could you speak about the side effects and risks that people need to know about?
Someone could die from our therapy, this is most likely to be the result of a runaway infection. We are very good at preventing that, we’ve had no deaths in trial participants with MS. In fact, of the 150 participants I will be reporting soon, we’ve only had one infection. Our procedure is not without risk, but you can minimize it if you follow proper procedures. That highest risk period lasts about eight days while they are recovering in the clinic.
Another risk to be aware of is the potential for infertility. It’s age-dependent and many of our patients have gone on and gotten pregnant even in their 30’s. We encourage people who are concerned about infertility to consider options such as sperm or egg storage prior to the procedure.
Most people get blood transfusions during this process. There is also a small risk of becoming infected with HIV or hepatitis. Again, the risk is very small. In my lifetime, I’ve probably transplanted about 1,500 patients and I’ve never had anyone get HIV or hepatitis from a blood transfusion, but you can never say for sure that there is no risk. Finally, late complications of this procedure unique to MS that may arise in a small subset are hypo or hyperthyroidism, or more rarely a drop in platelets that may require transient medical treatment to reverse.

Richard K. Burt, MD is Chief, Division of Immunotherapy at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois. An established international researcher, Dr Burt pioneered the use of hematopoietic stem cells to treat autoimmune diseases.
** Join the conversation about stem cells and MS here. **

http://www.msconnection.org/Blog/August-2014/Hematopoietic-Stem-Cell-Transplantation-An-Intervi#.U_62CW2eGYI.facebook

Sunday, August 24, 2014

Pilates MS Rehab After HSCT

Some people who do HSCT to stop MS are jogging on the beach a few months later. Not me. Though HSCT has stopped my MS and a recent MRI showed my lesions are no longer inflammatory, I still have significant neuromuscular damage from my Tysabri rebound attack. Nerve healing and retraining the muscles will take time – Dr. Burt says he's seen improvements for other MS patients continue for up to three years.

Remember, I was in a wheelchair a year ago. After HSCT seven months ago, the wheelchair now goes unused. Standard PT sessions and yoga have been somewhat helpful in improving my walking, but my recovery has not been as rapid as I'd hoped.  My goal is to be able to run again, hike a few miles, carry a 70-lb canoe, and go skiing. I did all those things with ease three years ago, and I want back what MS and the drug Tysabri took from me. Since working out harder isn't an option, I have to work smarter.

Most people today know Pilates as a hipster celebrity workout craze, but Joseph Pilates first developed it to rehab wounded war veterans in the early 1900s. The past couple of years have certainly felt like a war for me, and rehab is what I need.

I've found a pilates instructor, Kim Taraschi at New Movement Pilates, who has had good success with rehabbing MS and stroke patients. My hope is that her expertise will apply to my issues as well. The Pilates reformer machine and some mat techniques can simulate the motions of running. It might be just what I need. Maybe I'll get to be a success story for HSCT AND Pilates,  but there's still much work ahead for me. No one said it would be easy.








Saturday, August 23, 2014

Buck Up, Cowboy

There will come a time when you believe everything is finished. Yet that will be the beginning.



Everybody has MS a bit differently. For some, it's merely an inconvenience. Others, like me, experience severe symptoms including devastating fatigue, clinical depression, partial blindness, heat intolerance, bizarre sensations, extreme pain, spasms, numbness, loss of muscular control and crippling disability. It seems like the end.

What kept me going was more than hope. It was that I'd found out about HSCT and formed a plan to beat MS or die trying. Fading away was not an option. After I found Dr. Burt, he saw that he could help me. Six months after HSCT, an MRI scan now shows my MS is fully stopped. Thank you Dr. Burt! And though the HSCT procedure was not easy or cheap, it was not as miserable or dangerous as I was prepared for it to be. I have no doubt that HSCT not only stopped my MS, it saved my life.

For me, HSCT was just one step toward recovery. I have not used my wheelchair or my nursing home walker for several months now, but the MS Tysabri rebound attack that crippled me caused significant neuromuscular damage. My walking is still painful and labored. Now I'm doing physical therapy, qigong, yoga, acupuncture and pilates. When I want to give up, I just remember that walking beats the heck out of a wheelchair. And I remember that Dr. Burt and his team invested their valuable time in me.

Do you or someone your care about have MS that is getting worse despite MS drugs? Are you determined to not give up? Then apply ASAP to Dr. Burt's study or one of the reputable overseas clinics. Getting accepted to these programs takes precious time, months and perhaps years, so don't dawdle. Other patients are making it happen for themselves. I find it very encouraging that the most popular entry in my blog is Where to Get HSCT. There are a lot of determined MS patients out there.


Saturday, August 2, 2014

Tysabri Rebound Study

Most of the research regarding Tysabri safety has focused on the drug causing increased risk of death from the deadly brain infection PML. Something that the drug's creator, Lawrence Steinman, warned about more than a decade ago.

What's been largely glossed over are cases like mine, where blood tests identify the risk, but removal of the drug sets up the patient for a horrific MS rebound attack. The industry seems to think that by preventing rapid death by PML, these tests represent an acceptable safety protocol for using the dangerous drug. As someone who was crippled and almost killed by such a relapse, I could not disagree more.

In this under-publicized study, 52.9% of patients taken off of Tysabri showed unusually high MRI inflammation within a year, and 9% showed severe relapses 3 to 9 months after drug cessation.

Abnormal inflammatory activity returns after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24876183

Tysabri Risks Greater Than Expected

A recent study has shown higher risk with the MS drug Tysabri. It may explain how I first tested JC virus negative and then became JC virus positive after two years on the drug. 
----------------------------------

http://www.webmd.com/multiple-sclerosis/news/20140325/new-clues-to-link-between-ms-drug-tysabri-and-rare-brain-disease

New Clues to Link Between MS Drug Tysabri and Rare Brain Disease

Researchers report drug mobilizes a kind of cell easily infected by a virus that can attack the brain

By Brenda Goodman
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, March 25, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Researchers report that they think they have figured out why some patients who take the multiple sclerosis drug Tysabri face a high risk of developing a rare, and sometimes fatal, brain infection.
A common virus that can cause the brain disease progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) likes to infect and hide in certain blood cells that are mobilized by Tysabri, the study authors explained. Even more troubling, the researchers discovered that current tests may be missing some people who harbor the virus.
Right now, the risk of PML in patients treated with Tysabri for more than two years who also take other immune-suppressing drugs and test positive for antibodies to the virus, "is about one in 75 patients," said study author Eugene Major, a senior investigator at the U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) in Bethesda, Md. "That's a very high risk."
"We need to be able to understand why this therapy puts patients at risk. As we further define that, we'll be able to develop better tests and better treatment decisions can be made," Major said.
In PML, the normally harmless "JC virus" attacks the white matter of the brain, stripping nerve cells of their insulation. Without this insulation, nerve cells can't effectively carry brain signals. The disease causes progressive weakness, paralysis, changes in vision and speech, and problems with thinking and memory.
According to the NINDS, 30 percent to 50 percent of patients with PML die within a few months of diagnosis. Those who survive the infection may face permanent disability.
Though most people carry the JC virus, PML is rare. It tends to strike people with suppressed immune function, such as patients with AIDS or those taking powerful immune-suppressing drugs like Tysabri.
A combination of three factors seems to put MS patients at highest risk: treatment with Tysabri for more than two years; receiving other kinds of immune-suppressing medications; and testing positive for antibodies to the JC virus.
The drug has had a troubled history. First approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in November 2004, it was pulled off the market three months later after cases of PML occurred in ongoing clinical trials.
Since Tysabri was allowed back on the U.S. market in 2006 with strict prescribing conditions, more than 440 cases of PML have been reported in patients taking the drug, according to the study background. In 2010, the FDA added a warning about the heightened risk of PML to the drug's labeling.
To find out why the drug carries such a high risk of PML, researchers collected blood samples from two groups of MS patients -- those just starting treatment with Tysabri, and those who had been on the drug for more than two years. They compared those samples to blood taken from healthy volunteers.

The investigators were looking for a particular type of cell in the blood -- a kind of stem cell that turns into white blood cells called B-cell lymphocytes.
"Turns out in these MS patients treated with [Tysabri], the number of these blood stem cells is three- to 10-fold higher than you'd see normally under normal physiologic conditions," Major said.
"JC virus is able to infect these blood stem cells as they become a B lymphocyte," he explained. His working theory has been that these infected B lymphocytes then carry the infection into the brain.
To test that theory, the researchers wanted to see if they could find traces of the JC virus in circulating blood stem cells.
And they did. Of 26 patients who were just starting treatment with Tysabri, 50 percent had traces of the JC virus in their circulating blood stem cells. Of 23 patients who had taken the drug for more than two years, 44 percent had JC virus DNA in more than one kind of blood stem cell type. In contrast, only 17 percent of the 18 healthy volunteers had signs of the JC virus in those cells.
"It was somewhat surprising to us that quite a high percentage of individuals had detectable viral DNA in these blood stem cells," Major said.
But what isn't exactly clear is how this could affect their risk of developing PML. Most patients who tested positive for JC virus had only a few copies of the virus, suggesting that they were still at low risk of infection. Patients who had taken the drug for more than two years had higher virus counts than those who were just starting treatment.
"We need to look at additional patients, and follow them for a long period of time," Major said.
Perhaps most concerning, 10 study participants had evidence of the JC virus in their blood but tested negative for antibodies to it. That suggests current tests for the virus may be missing some patients who could be at high risk for PML infection, the authors explained.
An expert who was not involved in the study, which was published online March 25 in the journal JAMA Neurology, said the findings left some questions unanswered.
"Clearly, Tysabri seems to engender the release of JC virus-containing cells from the bone marrow," said Dr. Gary Birnbaum, a neurologist and director of the Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research Center in Golden Valley, Minn. "This could explain why risks of PML are high in patients on this drug," he noted.
"What isn't clear is why the risk escalates dramatically after two years, since JC virus-bearing cells emerge early in the course of treatment," Birnbaum pointed out.
Additionally, Birnbaum said it was "disquieting" that researchers found evidence of the JC virus in patients who then tested negative for antibodies to it.
"Thus, testing individuals for exposure to JC virus by measuring antibodies to the virus may be insufficient to fully assess their risks for developing PML," he said.

Friday, August 1, 2014

Tysabri Crippled and Almost Killed Me

My six-month evaluation post HSCT shows my MS has been stopped and all blood test levels, including thyroid, are in the normal range. I'm walking short distances without a cane and my wheelchair goes unused. It is so good to have a future to look forward to again.

Sometimes I see the unused wheelchair sitting at the back corner of my home, waiting to be donated. I'm so grateful not to need it, and I'll be glad to have it gone. But seeing the thing reminds me of the pain and the fear, and I get angry. Before I met Dr. Burt, and before I did HSCT, mismanagement of the drug Tysabri crippled and almost killed me.

I was one of the MS patients on Tysabri buying time, trying to keep the disease from getting worse. For many MS patients, Tysabri is still the best second-tier drug available, despite the risks. The problem with Tysabri is it's not meant to be used for more than two years, and until a better drug or  HSCT gets approved there's really no good alternative for patients to transition to.

This excellent Bloomberg article summarizes why MS patients are willing to risk death with Tysabri to avoid disability. Risking death to stay mobile fit my attitude about MS. I feared disability more than death. Little did I know that Tysabri would ultimately give me what I feared the most.

FDA realized the danger of PML in 2005 when patients treated with Tysabri started dying. The drug was temporarily withdrawn from the market, but Biogen convinced FDA to allow the drug to be reintroduced with more precautionary testing of patients.

Long before I knew of Dr. Burt and HSCT, I was assured by my now-ex neurologist  that the risk with Tysabri was manageable and that the drug was my best hope of avoiding disability, so I started monthly Tysabri infusions in 2010. But after two years on Tysabri, I went from success story to unfortunate statistic, when the risk management testing protocol discovered that I was at imminent risk of PML. The test that discovered I'd turned JC-positive may have saved me from death, but not the crippling nightmare that was to follow.

After my JC-positive test, my neurologist attempted to transition me off Tysabri and onto Biogen's (BG-12/Tecfidera), but delays in approval for that drug set me up for an MS rebound attack. Doctors still debate whether this attack was just the MS coming back hard, or a PML-related condition called  immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). When I called the neurologist with concern that my legs were getting rapidly weaker, he assured me that it wasn't due to IRIS. He had me on IV steroids twice a week and my recent MRI looked stable, so I should have been protected.

It wasn't until I dragged myself into his office with ski poles that he started to believe that I was having a serious MS rebound from coming off Tysabri. My legs were locked up in agonizing spasms, I had double vision, and I had developed bladder and fecal incontinence. A new MRI showed I had rapidly developing new lesions on my brainstem and motor strip areas of my brain. My condition had gone from moderate to serious in a very short time. The neurologist prescribed weekly plasmapheresis to remove some of the aggressive immune system antibodies from my blood. He also prescribed an electric wheelchair. I was still living independently, but just barely. I signed up for Metro Mobility van service for the handicapped and lived in misery with a semi-permanent catheter in my chest from June to December of 2013.

My neurologist advised me to wait for FDA approval of the drug Lemtrada (Campath). When I asked him about HSCT, he advised against it. But his statistics on HSCT mortality and efficacy didn't match the data I'd reviewed. Ultimately, our discussions turned combative, and I'd had enough of following advice that had crippled me. I made plans on my own to do HSCT in Chicago with Dr. Burt. Half-way through my HSCT treatment, I learned Lemtrada was rejected by FDA in December 2013.

It's quite possible I am an unusual case and most people on Tysabri will be fine. I'm no medical expert or statistician, so I really don't know. Looking back, though, I sure wish I'd never tried it. Following is a bit more information to chew on.

Inventor of Tysabri Says He Wouldn't Prescribe It
One of the creators of Tysabri, Dr. Lawrence Steinman, realized the potential dangers of Tysabri and warned the FDA not to approve it. Steinman now says Tysabri isn't worth the risk.


According to a New York Times article in March 2005, Dr. Steinman said he had expressed his apprehensions about the drug in speeches and in an article in the journal Science in July and had been asked by Biogen executives to tone down criticism of the drug.

Biogen sales of Tysabri have caused its stock to double in less than two years. An article in Forbes praised Biogen for managing the crisis that could have destroyed the company.The label change allowing its use may push Tysabri’s global sales to $2.5 billion to $3 billion by 2016

While Biogen Thrives, How Many Patients Are Harmed?
We do not know how many MS patients have been harmed by Tysabri. Biogen is not required to actively seek out adverse effects, and the FDA adverse events page has no way for consumers to access the complete numbers.  

According to e-healthme, a consumer site which compiles reports by the FDA,
On Mar, 5, 2014: 90,305 people reported to have side effects when taking Tysabri. Among them, 2,943 people (3.26%) have Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy.
665 people have died while on Tysabri.

Researchers are now discovering the JC Virus activated by Tysabri in neurons of the gray matter in people with MS.  The virus does not just show up as a demyelinating disease in white matter.  It is creating gray matter atrophy--literally, death of neurons.  This brain tissue loss can be seen on MRI.

There have been an unknown number of Tysabri deaths linked to problems other than PML, including antibody reactions, lethal relapses after withdrawal, and cancer. Deaths and injury from central nervous system PML, herpes encephalitis, CNS lymphoma, metastic melanoma, cryptococcal meningitis continue. Most of these neurologic infections do not show up until after two years of Tysabri.

Dr. Steinman is still speaking out on Tysabri--no longer to the press, but in medical presentations at universities. He has explained the "massive failure" of Tysabri trials to show PML risk, since the mice could not develop this deadly brain disease. His online powerpoint presentation on this topic has been removed from the internet, but I did find this powerpoint link that shows the efficacy and side effects of various MS drugs, including Tysabri.